4 ms·The point is that it didn't work, so exponentiation was out the window.by techonup 11y agoThe point is that it didn't work, so exponentiation was out the window.tikhonj 11y agoMy point was that 1,1,1 is 1^1,1^2,1^3 and actually fits the pattern :).firethief 11y agoRight - by fitting the pattern but failing the actual criterion, it disproves the consecutive exponents hypothesis.