4 ms·
It all looks great. Could you perhaps license your test suite and maybe your libc stuff MIT? I understand if you want to keep your kernel and compiler under som
by tinco 11y ago
It all looks great. Could you perhaps license your test suite and maybe your libc stuff MIT? I understand if you want to keep your kernel and compiler under some license that still allows for commercial control (like GPL or some dual license scheme) but there's not much commercial value in the test suite and I think it could be of value to others :)
- robertelder 11y agoWhat do you think about Apache 2.0?
- tinco 11y agoI myself like to keep the world neatly divided in GPL and MIT, but Apache 2.0 looks permissive enough :) What makes you prefer Apache 2.0 over MIT?
- robertelder 11y agoThe Apache license explicitly mentions patents. I think that for a project to be successful it should be painless for big companies to use it. Lawyers and IP people at large companies generally have a much more serious tone than programmers when it comes to considering which licenses they can include in their stack.