4 ms·
Leal was never responsible for the water supply, he only had a cursory interest in the water supply. His real interest was public health, unlike the Walkerton c
by uxp 11y ago
Leal was never responsible for the water supply, he only had a cursory interest in the water supply. His real interest was public health, unlike the Walkerton case, where they were responsible for the water supply and actively withheld information that indicated that the supply was unsafe for culinary use.