The amended section of the report asks to extend that provision to cover the entire EU. Even the parties that voted for the change (because protecting artists

The amended section of the report asks to extend that provision to cover the entire EU. Even the parties that voted for the change (because protecting artists can't be a bad thing, right?) aren't sure any more after artists (incl. architects who are the most obvious beneficiaries of such legislation) complained. And it only covers buildings that aren't out of copyright (ie. if it's personal copyright, the original artist not yet dead for 70 years, for corporate copyright 95 years IIRC).