> entire global warming case rests on the results of a single research group. To me it looks a lot more like the CDO thing with banking. They compare their dat

> entire global warming case rests on the results of a single research group. To me it looks a lot more like the CDO thing with banking. They compare their data with other people's results and throw out what doesn't look correct without giving a good reason (e.g. tree ring reconstruction after 1960). The argument from this selected data is that "we all couldn't be wrong"... Meanwhile the horror videos show of glaciers breaking up (a seasonal process) blaming that on climate change. Yet, no mention is made of the increasing ice in Antarctica since 1980. The few that acknowledges this fact blames it on global warming...