4 ms·

We're seeing a couple of markets here, the "business advisory board for the business owner" market being the most pormising one. It's too early to tell which on

by Tawheed 17y ago

We're seeing a couple of markets here, the "business advisory board for the business owner" market being the most pormising one. It's too early to tell which ones will pan out. This really falls into the category of "Forum 2.0" -- except we offer a fully hosted solution, no pain to set up, and most importantly, a much better user interface for having meaningful private discussions with the people you trust the most. It also introduces the element of consensus building through voting, which Forums have no concept of today -- making your discussions not only a healthy debate but also one that is productive and helps reach an informed decision.

alttab 17y ago
This would be useful - if it was free. This feedback is of course just my two cents, but as a serial-entrepreneur I can't see this being useful after the first month. Otherwise, if a tool like this can be used for all decisions, its basically an asynchronous net-meeting with voting, which isn't anything other software (even the new disappointing Google Wave could do this), but certainly not for $20 a month. I initial impression is this is something you wanted to build - and thought that because it was a complete idea that could be followed through on that it would convert into a good SaaS. A complete idea is necessary, but not sufficient. I also think people hit the nail on the head - the privacy issue is huge. If people have their next super-awesome start up idea, they certainly aren't going to discuss it on a web application. They would be handing over their idea to the developers (have you given them a solid reason to trust you?), and even unintentional exploits/loopholes/bugs could expose the business IP of all of your users. The UI/site looks very well put together. The designers definitely have that department down. But overall it seems like you're trying to sell a solution to a problem that's either already been solved for free many times over, is not that big of a problem, or providing only marginal organizational value-add for your price. Again, just my 0.02, good work so far!

by Tawheed 17y ago

alttab 17y ago

This would be useful - if it was free. This feedback is of course just my two cents, but as a serial-entrepreneur I can't see this being useful after the first month. Otherwise, if a tool like this can be used for all decisions, its basically an asynchronous net-meeting with voting, which isn't anything other software (even the new disappointing Google Wave could do this), but certainly not for $20 a month. I initial impression is this is something you wanted to build - and thought that because it was a complete idea that could be followed through on that it would convert into a good SaaS. A complete idea is necessary, but not sufficient. I also think people hit the nail on the head - the privacy issue is huge. If people have their next super-awesome start up idea, they certainly aren't going to discuss it on a web application. They would be handing over their idea to the developers (have you given them a solid reason to trust you?), and even unintentional exploits/loopholes/bugs could expose the business IP of all of your users. The UI/site looks very well put together. The designers definitely have that department down. But overall it seems like you're trying to sell a solution to a problem that's either already been solved for free many times over, is not that big of a problem, or providing only marginal organizational value-add for your price. Again, just my 0.02, good work so far!