3 ms·
Speaking of misrepresenting... In the response you link, "abh" agreed about a specific point in "Poettering's reasoning": Lennarts reasons for not using *
by AdieuToLogic 11y ago
Speaking of misrepresenting...
In the response you link, "abh" agreed about a specific point in "Poettering's reasoning":
Lennarts reasons for not using
*.systemd.pool.ntp.org ("systemd isn't a
distribution") makes sense to me.
This is very different than agreeing that hard-coding a set of NTP servers into the code base is the way to go. To this point, "abh" wrote:
I'd suggest having no default NTP servers in
the systemd code...
Which is what many others have requested as well. If this were an isolated decision, it would be a different thing. But it is not, as several others in this thread have provided supporting evidence[1].
1 - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=761658 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=761658
- Merovius 11y agoI am sorry if I was unclear in that. My comment (and similar comments in other threads) directly referred to criticism of Lennart for deciding that he doesn't want a vendor zone for systemd. In regards to the DNS server comment: I said it elsewhere before, this is completely unrelated. You may disagree with the decision from a political viewpoint and that is totally fine. But from a technical viewpoint the usage of the Google DNS Servers is completely reasonable.