First, to be clear, I agree with your main point ... I'm just arguing off-topic about Jackson vs. The Beatles. :) Second, these minor differences between the t

First, to be clear, I agree with your main point ... I'm just arguing off-topic about Jackson vs. The Beatles. :) Second, these minor differences between the two are not relevant ... they amount to nit-picking. My point is that they Michael Jackson and The Beatles are in the same equivalence class. Who sold more records or whatever really isn't particularly important.