> Did I talk about Racket anywhere? This is a thread about Racket, if you did not notice. > Are you really arguing that implementing some other language is th

> Did I talk about Racket anywhere? This is a thread about Racket, if you did not notice. > Are you really arguing that implementing some other language is the way to go? This is exactly what Lisps are about. You've got a nearly raw AST at the bottom (S-expressions) and then you build up a hierarchy of languages on top of it.