3 ms·
> Firstly, Racket is not a Scheme. Did I talk about Racket anywhere? > Does this look like S-expressions to you? "MiniPacal implemented in Racket" Are you r
by ahoge 11y ago
> Firstly, Racket is not a Scheme.
Did I talk about Racket anywhere?
> Does this look like S-expressions to you?
"MiniPacal implemented in Racket"
Are you really arguing that implementing some other language is the way to go?
https://github.com/eudoxia0/cmacro https://github.com/eudoxia0/cmacro
http://research.swtch.com/shmacro http://research.swtch.com/shmacro
Totally legit "C".
- sklogic 11y ago> Did I talk about Racket anywhere? This is a thread about Racket, if you did not notice. > Are you really arguing that implementing some other language is the way to go? This is exactly what Lisps are about. You've got a nearly raw AST at the bottom (S-expressions) and then you build up a hierarchy of languages on top of it.