4 ms·
Every time I see someone point out a problem with systemd the response always seems to be "that's just <subcomponent>, and using it is optional". Why can't sys
by bahamat 11y ago
Every time I see someone point out a problem with systemd the response always seems to be "that's just <subcomponent>, and using it is optional".
Why can't systemd developers/apologists take responsibility for their bad design and horrible decisions?
- reagency 11y agoBecause Ubuntu become massively successful with its bad designs and horrible decisions, so now they have imitators. Except Ubuntu did it by being good first and then attract a bunch of coattail riders to run the ship aground. Systemd got it backwards.
- oblio 11y agoWhat does Ubuntu have to do with this? What exactly are these fatal Ubuntu flaws?
- yellowapple 11y ago> What does Ubuntu have to do with this? Another example of a defective software product with an egotistical maniac at the helm (Mark Shuttleworth)? > What exactly are these fatal Ubuntu flaws? Unity? Upstart? Mir? The Amazon Shopping lens? A general failure to listen to the very community Canonical markets as a selling point? A terminal case of Not-Invented-Here syndrome? An inability to prevent any Ubuntu-derived device (Ubuntu for Android, Ubuntu TV, and Ubuntu's mobile edition thus far) from being more-or-less commercial flops stuck permanently in development hell until they become vaporware?