3 ms·

I was going to post that link. This is the standard theory, isn't it? Most physicists subscribe to this, regardless of their interpretation of quantum mechanics

I was going to post that link. This is the standard theory, isn't it? Most physicists subscribe to this, regardless of their interpretation of quantum mechanics (Copenhagen, De Broglie–Bohm, and so on?)

dogma1138 11y ago
Yes basically if you build say 2 entangled bytes you'll basically get random data out of them every time you measure / set their state you'll basically get random data. The only way to make the data "make sense" is to share the measurements between both observers on a side channel. But and that's the big but which i don't understand and couldn't get a decent explanation from anyone who i know has some / more understanding that i do in QPT. Yes i understand if you got 2 observers Alice and Bob both of them with a pair of say you got a pair of 12 entangled quantum bytes. Bob can't tell by random measurement if Alice has done something since the state of his 12 qbytes is "random", however if the interpreted say say's Hello World! or I Just Changed It why Bob can't superimpose additional information he has such as the knowledge of the English language to interpolate that Alice actually did something. On top of that the no information theorem is also tied to the no-cloning theorem which conflicts with well with how some one would explain quantum teleportation. The explanation I managed to find is that the no-cloning and no-teleportation theorems do not prevent quantum teleportation but rather classical one which means that you cannot encode a quantum state into a classical system and then clone/teleport that information into another quantum system, but you can do it from one quantum system to another which is where my brains starts to scream. http://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse599d/06wi/lecturenotes4.pdf http://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse599d/06wi/lectur...

dogma1138 11y ago

Yes basically if you build say 2 entangled bytes you'll basically get random data out of them every time you measure / set their state you'll basically get random data. The only way to make the data "make sense" is to share the measurements between both observers on a side channel. But and that's the big but which i don't understand and couldn't get a decent explanation from anyone who i know has some / more understanding that i do in QPT. Yes i understand if you got 2 observers Alice and Bob both of them with a pair of say you got a pair of 12 entangled quantum bytes. Bob can't tell by random measurement if Alice has done something since the state of his 12 qbytes is "random", however if the interpreted say say's Hello World! or I Just Changed It why Bob can't superimpose additional information he has such as the knowledge of the English language to interpolate that Alice actually did something. On top of that the no information theorem is also tied to the no-cloning theorem which conflicts with well with how some one would explain quantum teleportation. The explanation I managed to find is that the no-cloning and no-teleportation theorems do not prevent quantum teleportation but rather classical one which means that you cannot encode a quantum state into a classical system and then clone/teleport that information into another quantum system, but you can do it from one quantum system to another which is where my brains starts to scream. http://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse599d/06wi/lecturenotes4.pdf http://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse599d/06wi/lectur...