5 ms·

Can you be more specific? Is it car engine telemetry?

• engi_nerd 11y ago
  Aircraft telemetry.
  • maaku 11y ago
    You really need to know the position of an aircraft to a thousandth of a second?
    • engi_nerd 11y ago
      I said nothing about position. But a lot of things measured have to do with how the structure of the aircraft responds to turbulence, rough air, and aeroacoustic vibration (aka flutter). So there might be modes where structural components have harmonics that are pretty high (several hundred to over 1000 Hz). Therefore you must use a transducer that has a frequency response that can cover that range, and sample the output of the transducer at least twice that rate (at an absolute theoretical minimum, but rule of thumb is 5x oversampling).
      • Serow225 11y ago
        The highest sample rates I remember seeing was 20kHz, for the pressure sensors used in turbofan inlet distortion testing.
        • engi_nerd 11y ago
          That isn't out of line with the ways I have seen that sort of thing measured.
    • akavel 11y ago
      Possibly he might measure some other thing, but still after your question I started to wonder how much a passenger plane moves per thousandth of a second. So: some quick googling suggests that "economical cruising speed" of an Airbus A320 is 840km/h [1]. After quick back-of-envelope calculations, this gives ~230m/s, so 0.2m per 0.001s. Given some possible uncertainty of a single measurement, I'd imagine that's not unreasonable level of precision when e.g. your Airbus is landing on an airport. [1]: http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=23 http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=23
      • engi_nerd 11y ago
        I guess I should mention that GPS position is a perfectly normal thing to include in a telemetry stream.
        • bulte-rs 11y ago
          + ins position of course; gps position is not reliable enough (less gbas) to land a big plane with.