11 ms·

So what _is_ the reason? I have always assumed that this is an example of regulatory capture: existing barbers gain from raising the barrier of entry for compet

So what _is_ the reason? I have always assumed that this is an example of regulatory capture: existing barbers gain from raising the barrier of entry for competitors, while non-barbers don't care enough about it to lobby.

AjithAntony 11y ago
2000hrs of barber training
andrewvc 11y ago
The reason is that barbers have sharp things and deal with many people. Also lice. There's a very real public health risk if done incorrectly.
- jusben1369 11y ago
  Proving that there are reasons for some certification is not really an answer though. I think the question is "Does it really take 2 years to get a solid grasp on those things?" (I've noticed several answers with a similar answer not just yours)
Retra 11y ago
There are of rules for proper sanitation and safety, as well as continuing education requirements that are enforced through licensing.
- pkaye 11y ago
  And some of it is regulatory capture... restrict how easy it is for others to enter the market.
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
- s73v3r 11y ago
  There's a lot of shit to learn.
  - busterarm 11y ago
    Yeah...there's a huge disconnect here for me with this community reading these posts. There's so many people advocating "10,000 hours" for proficiency in things here and then going "why can't just anyone cut my hair?".