And NCAR doesn't just do global warming research, either. There really is no such thing that I can see as "anti-climate-change" research so it would be rather

And NCAR doesn't just do global warming research, either. There really is no such thing that I can see as "anti-climate-change" research so it would be rather difficult to find a direct comparison. > You can't compare the 'income' of two arbitrary non-profits (greenpeace and AEI) and draw any conclusion from it either. Why not? My purpose here is only to give a counterexample to the 'policy' portion of the claim that the "anti-climate-change" side is "dwarfed" by the pro- side. It's fair to say that both Greenpeace and AEI do are quite active on the issue (I picked the first two that came to mind); equally it's fair to say that Greenpeace certainly does not 'dwarf' AEI; and further it seems reasonable that Greenpeace isn't massively outspending AEI even on the single issue of climate change. It seems to me almost certain that the opposite is true.