3 ms·
Oh man, that code is just horrible. No comments on some of the functions, no comments on the input parameters and return values pretty much throughout. I reall
by imaginenore 11y ago
Oh man, that code is just horrible. No comments on some of the functions, no comments on the input parameters and return values pretty much throughout.
I really thought OpenSSL was in a much better shape.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- jerf 11y agoCode that implements standards should be read with the standard open next to it. This code: https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git;a=blob;f=crypto/md5/md5_dgst.c;h=335126c76d8fdc7f59dd68b2bbe134216c68ae26;hb=HEAD https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git;a=blob;f=crypto/md5/m... looks like awful garbage, until you compare it to https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1321.txt https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1321.txt , and then you realize you don't really want comments or anything else cluttering up the implementation.
- justizin 11y ago> I really thought OpenSSL was in a much better shape. Why?