3 ms·
Firefox renders pages terribly and is the real dud here. edit: not speed, but aesthetic quality and parity with Chrome/Safari
by tzakrajs 11y ago
Firefox renders pages terribly and is the real dud here.
edit: not speed, but aesthetic quality and parity with Chrome/Safari
- tzakrajs 11y agoEvidence is anecdotal and based on browser compatibility bugs reported to me on web apps I develop. Chrome and Safari are best in class in this regard. Firefox has gross UI elements that remind me of the 90s.
- Cshelton 11y agoDo you have a very outdated version of FF? Firefox is actually starting to beat Chrome on many benchmarks once again.
- coldtea 11y agoHe's talking about rendering (quality) not speed.
- zecg 11y agoMobile Firefox, however, is the only way to have a competent ad blocker on mobile: https://addons.mozilla.org/En-us/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/ https://addons.mozilla.org/En-us/firefox/addon/ublock-origin...
- zimpenfish 11y agoAlthough Mobile Safari will no doubt get a deluge once iOS 9 is released. cf. http://murphyapps.co/blog/2015/6/24/an-hour-with-safari-content-blocker-in-ios-9 http://murphyapps.co/blog/2015/6/24/an-hour-with-safari-cont...