2 ms·
> EDIT: No idea why you're being down-voted. Making wild accusations with absolutely no proof would be my guess. Also the bogus moral equivalence he used to k
by beedogs 11y ago
> EDIT: No idea why you're being down-voted.
Making wild accusations with absolutely no proof would be my guess. Also the bogus moral equivalence he used to kick this thread off.
- tptacek 11y agoFor whatever it's worth to you: I think it's telling that you thing the allegations I'm bringing up are "wild". They obviously aren't that: they're first-Google-SERP, running- under- the- Guardian- masthead allegations. I didn't make any of them up. I didn't get them from WorldNetDaily. What your wording suggests is that you'd find any allegation that challenged your perception of Wikileaks to be wild and unfounded.