2 ms·
Wikipedia tends to be pretty poor on historical board games, as a lot of populist books have been written on the topic which focus more on entertainment rather
by ig1 17y ago
Wikipedia tends to be pretty poor on historical board games, as a lot of populist books have been written on the topic which focus more on entertainment rather than accuracy.
Here's an original source Fulke's period work on the topic:
http://jducoeur.org/game-hist/fulke.html http://jducoeur.org/game-hist/fulke.html
And here's a reconstruction filling in gaps in Fulke using other primary sources:
http://jducoeur.org/game-hist/game-recon-rhythbasics.html http://jducoeur.org/game-hist/game-recon-rhythbasics.html
- andrewcooke 17y agothanks. if that's your page you may want to fix a small error - a "3" in the example on geomteric proportions should be "2".