3 ms·
>>It seems a bit stupid that to see more copies you need to have a high volume to crack into a best selling list. Why do you say it is stupid ? Shouldn't a "be
by credo 17y ago
>>It seems a bit stupid that to see more copies you need to have a high volume to crack into a best selling list.
Why do you say it is stupid ?
Shouldn't a "best selling list" be created based on the definition of a "best selling list" ?
Btw rankings based on the standard "best seller" definition cannot be maniuplated the way that rankings based on "ratings" can be manipulated.
imo Apple's current ranking policy - ranking by best-seller-list and also ranking by most-revenue-earned (i.e. the top grossing list) - is good.
- stonemetal 17y ago>>rankings based on the standard "best seller" definition cannot be maniuplated Why not?(I don't have an iPhone, so I really don't know anything about it.) It would be fairly easy to buy your own app. A $0.99 app and 30% fee to apple, you could buy your app 300 times a week for $90. If it is really that much of a hit driven market it might be worth it. Apple would love it(cash and being able to claim the next billion sold that much faster.)