Ethnography is a valuable tool. But it is not science. Science is about prediction, reproduction, an falsifiability. Ethnography lacks these and thus it is not

Ethnography is a valuable tool. But it is not science. Science is about prediction, reproduction, an falsifiability. Ethnography lacks these and thus it is not science. I have no issues with ethnography being used to broaden our understanding, but the understanding should be there that this is not science (and should not be called science) and the biases of the author have more of a chance to come into play.