4 ms·
This is so true, BSD's in general are very underrated.
by zkanda 11y ago
This is so true, BSD's in general are very underrated.
- baldfat 11y agoI don't think people under rate it. The issue is that BSD is so much server focused in users and development and it lags behind Linux Desktop (which is still a small percentage). There is just a high amount of programs that are not available in BSD. I use to have me personal server as BSD and used FreeNAS quite a bit. Due to lack of certain "cool" applications I wanted to run on my machine I just switched to BSD.
- feld 11y agoThere is not a "high amount" of programs unavailable in BSD. There are specialized programs that need some Linux-specific syscalls which won't run on it. That's about it.
- RexRollman 11y agoFrom my perspective, the BSDs are focused on what they should be: making a good version of Unix. I feel that the Linux developers are spending too much effort on the "desktop", which is why we have now have GNU/SystemD.
- nextos 11y agoThat's true. I hate the great divide amongst Linux & BSDs cause otherwise we could have the best of both worlds.