3 ms·
I think the original article deals with working under contact for a start up, not as a founder. The context seems to be people with specialised skills who are a
by nvader 11y ago
I think the original article deals with working under contact for a start up, not as a founder. The context seems to be people with specialised skills who are approached by start ups for specific items of work (graphic design projects), with an expectation of free our cheap labour.
I agree with other commenters that if you are a cofounder, the situation is different. Since you are getting equity in consideration, as soon as it matters to get these legal protections, you must provide a license, and preferably, attribute ownership of the software to the company.
- theorique 11y agoThe context seems to be people with specialised skills who are approached by start ups for specific items of work (graphic design projects), with an expectation of free our cheap labour. What's the potential benefit to the contractor, to do free work for a startup? Is it an actual thing to ask service providers or solo practitioners to work for no cash and no equity?
- cdcarter 11y agoYes. The benefit is "exposure" or "portfolio pieces" and it's terrible.