3 ms·
Wow, that's a pretty bad illustration of leap smearing. I think a much nicer illustration would have been roughly like this (with obvious limitations caused by
by cnvogel 11y ago
Wow, that's a pretty bad illustration of leap smearing. I think a much nicer illustration would have been roughly like this (with obvious limitations caused by the ASCII spacing):
Real: true time, showing the 61st second
Comp: computer time, only counting 60 seconds
not smeared,
time counted at regular speed
...--->| |<---...
Real 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 00 01 02 03
Comp 54 55 56 57 58 59 00 01 02 03
|<- smearing ----------->|
time counting slowed down
by 20%
- MereInterest 11y agoAlso, who the heck decided to call it a "leap smear"? There isn't anything "leap"ing about it anymore. If you are changing from "leap second" to something indicating smearing, "smear second" is the logical choice.
- pdpi 11y agoWell, you're turning a leap into a smear, so "leap smearing" seems like a perfectly apt description.