3 ms·
Maybe I'm in minority, but I'd have preferred a userscript/extension alternative for those who don't use a bookmarks bar. edit: Never mind, made a quick one fo
by liviu- 11y ago
Maybe I'm in minority, but I'd have preferred a userscript/extension alternative for those who don't use a bookmarks bar.
edit: Never mind, made a quick one for myself seeing that's MIT licensed https://gist.github.com/liviu-/62e8ce91b8723ef1a10a https://gist.github.com/liviu-/62e8ce91b8723ef1a10a
- prezjordan 11y agoDefinitely not in the minority. Bookmarklet was a little easier to get out the door, and I haven't found a great way to maintain extensions for several browsers. Will definitely up its priority. Userscript is an awesome idea, thanks for taking the time to build this out. Is this something that will work in all browsers? What's the installation process like? Perhaps we can build one of those into the project page as well.
- liviu- 11y agoAlthough userscripts themselves are cross-browser compatible, I don't know of any browser that offers native support for them. However, there are extensions that manages them (Greasemonkey for Firefox, Tampermonkey for Chrome, etc.) Once the user has a userscript manager installed, the installation process is a matter of a one click job.
- prezjordan 11y agoInteresting, thanks for the explanation. Perhaps we can detect if a popular userscript manager is installed and provide a one-click link that way. Not sure if this is possible though.
- ryukafalz 11y agoChrome/ium apparently has had built-in support for a while: https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/user-scripts https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/user-sc...