> The idea is that nothing should come between a founder and the idea/MVP. Nothing. I think those barriers that come between founders and MVP are important obs

> The idea is that nothing should come between a founder and the idea/MVP. Nothing. I think those barriers that come between founders and MVP are important obstacles to learn to overcome. IF you can't get an MVP off the ground, with all the distractions like incorporating, how the heck do you hope to survive the real challenges of a startup like figuring out how to make payroll when there is no money in the bank. Maybe i'm wrong, but something about removing these barriers strikes me as self-defeating, and would likely lead you on a journey with lots of folks who never should be doing startups in the first place. It's not like the barrier to entry is so big right now...but your belief that "nothing should come between a founder and an MVP" is fundamentally flawed. A better mantra would be, "A good founder wont let anything get in the way of launching an MVP." Just my two cents. Edit: Grammar