"You don't understand that "common good" is impossible to define" Maybe I do understand that. I'm not "sea-lioning" you at all. I'm just responding to a derisi

"You don't understand that "common good" is impossible to define" Maybe I do understand that. I'm not "sea-lioning" you at all. I'm just responding to a derisive and dismissive remark you made to a (IMOP) valid point. I don't necessarily believe in the validity of "discoveries" of utilitarian ethics. But I do believe "good" has, as you say, no general meaning. Which is why it is an interesting question.