I don't see how it makes sense to focus on a single study in 1953. Most of the comments here imply that this study found the truth, which has been ignored or f

I don't see how it makes sense to focus on a single study in 1953. Most of the comments here imply that this study found the truth, which has been ignored or forgotten since then. On the other hand, the mainstream claims to have come to a different conclusion on diet based on a huge number of other studies [0][1]. If you're going to use this study as evidence for low carb diets, you have to explain why this particular study is so important, why it was better designed or otherwise more conclusive that studies that came before/after it, etc. Otherwise this is just cherry picking. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-carbohydrate_diet#Opinions_from_major_governmental_and_medical_organizations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-carbohydrate_diet#Opinions... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_research_related_to_low-carbohydrate_diets https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_research_related_to_lo...