3 ms·
So if I understand correctly: There are loyalist teams and there are mercenaries. Loyalists have a special feature of being behind their leader whatever happen
by Jugurtha 11y ago
So if I understand correctly:
There are loyalist teams and there are mercenaries. Loyalists have a special feature of being behind their leader whatever happens, because he has a mission.
If the employees are not in that category, they are, by default, mercenaries.
So you need to get people who are not mercenaries and go look for them in locations that are not as active as the Silicon Valley (where they have, de facto, more options). Look for them in the rural edge of the wafer.
Did I understand correctly the gist of it?
There are different words to describe this:
- Cognitive dissonance: It is the employees who are mercenaries. The leader has nothing to blame himself for. He's a leader with a cause and a mission. It's their fault.
(The world isn't in short supply of sanguinary people and dictators. They are leaders. They have a mission and values. I guess people who left them are mercenaries too, by the post's logic. Since it doesn't say anything about what the "leader" is doing, what the "mission" is, and is the mission in the field the same as the one on paper).
- Manicheism: Either loyalists or mercenaries. Because hackers think in terms of combo boxes and two options are enough. Binary is nice.