3 ms·
This has potential but why 3? Why not 2.7? Also, what about asynchronous operations?
by curiously 11y ago
This has potential but why 3? Why not 2.7?
Also, what about asynchronous operations?
- aroberge 11y ago2.7 is a dead end. Python 3 is now at least 7 if not 8 years old. Brython was obviously created with the future, not the past, in mind.
- curiously 11y agolot of libraries won't work with python 3 which is why 2.7 still matters, besides, plenty of people prefer 2.7 over 3, 3 is kinda weird.
- douche 11y agoWhy? Print is a function instead of a statement? I don't do much python anymore, since I graduated from pygame to DirectX, but the differences in python 3 seem pretty minor, aside from needing external libs upgraded.
- jmmcd 11y agoLots of libraries won't work with Brython either.
- Nemcue 11y ago> lot of libraries won't work with python 3 which is why 2.7 still matters A lot of libraries actually work with python 3. And most of them that don't have a python 3 version in the pipe. http://py3readiness.org/ http://py3readiness.org/