4 ms·
> I was gone within a few months, my other coworker soon after, and the most senior engineer on the team transferred within the company. Translation: Amazon su
by tjradcliffe 11y ago
> I was gone within a few months, my other coworker soon after, and the most senior engineer on the team transferred within the company.
Translation: Amazon suffered almost 100% knowledge loss on the systems your team were the exclusive owners of. The cost of this kind of thing is staggering and yet I've seen companies discount it again and again, over decades. It's insane.
And as to your current gig: run. You'll never be able to grow a decent team with an idiot in charge, and you've got an idiot in charge. Get out, if you can. Nothing but good teams build good products, and if you can't hire a good team because you've got an idiot with a veto you'll be stuck building mediocre (at best) products.
It's a pity there is no actual demand for quality software developers. If there was, this kind of nonsense would be abraded away by market forces with incredible speed. The fact that it persists demonstrates that hardly anyone really cares whether they get good developers or not.
- keithpeter 11y ago"You'll never be able to grow a decent team with an idiot in charge, and you've got an idiot in charge." Perhaps the gentleman concerned is simply someone who helped start the company and hasn't quite understood the need for routine staff turnover in what is now a much larger organisation?
- joesmo 11y agoThat doesn't excuse his idiocy or the fact that he's sabotaging the hiring process. The original advice is spot on. You can't fix stupid people.