3 ms·
Yep, I agree here. Sounds like to me the article is trying too hard to sound smart in its "research" and "economics", and consequently fails to make some simple
by personjerry 11y ago
Yep, I agree here. Sounds like to me the article is trying too hard to sound smart in its "research" and "economics", and consequently fails to make some simpler reasonings, such as perhaps they didn't want to waste food. Or in other words: 20pcs for 6.40 is the REAL pricing, they just offer a smaller portion (making them more profit) for the same amount of money, if you so desire.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- vidarh 11y agoI so wish more places would let me get a smaller portion, or opt out of certain things, even at the same price.
- roel_v 11y agoYeah, me too. Some places seem to think that they're doing you a favor by heaping mountains of food on a plate. I'm not a big eater (and yet still eat too much...), and I don't like having to send back a half full plate. Just give me a normal portion already; although I've stopped asking for it, because 90% of restaurants have no clue on how to approximate the size of a 'normal' portion, or the concept of 'balance' (half the amount of pasta with the same amount of sauce - thanks but no thanks).
- megablast 11y agoSeem like the article wanted to explain a few cool concepts in an interesting way.