4 ms·
Nice! But in my opinion better help archiveteam with their efforts!
by lcswi 11y ago
Nice! But in my opinion better help archiveteam with their efforts!
- hydragit 11y agoI confess my ignorance regarding archive.org's various collections. There seem to be a lot of them, which one are you referring to?
- danieloaks 11y agoThey're not a part of archive.org (just a totally separate group with similar interests, lead by Jason Scott). The specific project page is here: http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=SourceForge http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=SourceForge The best place to pop in is probably on IRC. For the Sourceforge project it's #coldstorage on EFnet, http://chat.efnet.org:9090/?nick=&channels=%23coldstorage&Login=Login http://chat.efnet.org:9090/?nick=&channels=%23coldstorage&Lo... for the web client. Though note, the ArchiveTeam project seems to be paused right now.
- bentpins 11y agoTo add to this - ArchiveTeam often works with archive.org who have arranged long term storage for a lot of retrieved content.
- voltagex_ 11y agoSee the response just above yours - ArchiveTeam is separate from archive.org
- josso 11y agoDefinitely. And if you want to help out visit [1]. There’s options to download binaries[2] as well as source code[3] from SourceForge. [1]: http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=SourceForge http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=SourceForge [2]: https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/sourceforge-grab https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/sourceforge-grab [3]: https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/sourceforge-grab-rsync https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/sourceforge-grab-rsync
- coliveira 11y agoAgreed. This article sounds more like an advertisement for GH. Also, why not using other platforms like bitbucket? Centralizing everything at GH is the worst scenario for open source.
- shiggerino 11y agoBitbucket is exactly the same. Gitlab has a community edition, and then there's Gogs, Kallithea and a few others.