4 ms·
> It would be rather regressive to tax a two-person household each earning $25k/yr at the same rate as a single individual making $50k/yr, despite the fact that
by learnstats2 11y ago
> It would be rather regressive to tax a two-person household each earning $25k/yr at the same rate as a single individual making $50k/yr, despite the fact that household income is the same.
Two individual people earning $25k should pay a lower rate of tax than one individual earning $50k, yes.
But a marriage-based tax break is not the right way to implement this. Tax them individually, just like everyone else, with a progressive tax.
The married couple already have significant financial advantages over the single person: the financial security that comes from having two incomes (or even from having one person managing the household, if that's what you're imagining) is huge.
- eitally 11y agoBut historically, two income households have not been common. This is a recent (past two generations) turn of events. I agree that a marriage-based tax break may not have been sensible, although now with gay marriage legal nationwide, as long as the government also recognizes civil unions, it may be ok and solve the part of the problem you note.
- plorkyeran 11y agoDual-income families have been the norm for 40 years now, out of the 100 years that the modern income tax has even existed.