3 ms·
> the largest US source is M16s (and maybe M4s now) donated to the Mexican government and then stolen Source for this claim? >second is Communist bloc stuff b
by yohoho22 11y ago
> the largest US source is M16s (and maybe M4s now) donated to the Mexican government and then stolen
Source for this claim?
>second is Communist bloc stuff bought on the open market
What market is that?
>There's not much utility in tracing any of these guns, except of course to propagandize for gun control in the US (see Fast and Furious for the most egregious example).
Are you actually claiming that "Fast and Furious" was an attempt to manufacture fodder for US domestic gun control efforts?
> Which makes me wonder why this cartel felt a need to make their own AR-15s or M16s (the article didn't mention if these were 3 round burst or full auto, did it)? If they can get their hands on rocket propelled grenades....
Yeah, makes one wonder, doesn't it?
>Then again, this whole expose might be a lie (again, see Fast and Furious).
Maybe this whole post I'm replying to is the product of someone who is profoundly fucked in the head.
Funny how utter garbage like you've produced here fares just fine on this site where the posters typically trip all over one another to be the most skeptical and supposedly clear-eyed. I guess you paranoid, mentally unbalanced gun creeps just freak them out enough that they simply stay away.
- hga 11y agoThe only other theory about Fast and Furious that makes sense is that the ATF decided to supply one or more cartels with guns, either as a matter of national policy or internal ATF corruption, and the gun control propaganda was gravy. It certainly wasn't a law enforcement operation, seeing as it violated an ATF cardinal rule about giving guns to criminals.