3 ms·
This is exciting to see here! I’ve spent a lot of time and effort on the challenges surrounding effective philanthropy. Prior to seeing it firsthand while mana
by jonpaine 11y ago
This is exciting to see here! I’ve spent a lot of time and effort on the challenges surrounding effective philanthropy.
Prior to seeing it firsthand while managing IT for a non-profit, I imagined that the bottleneck issues were advanced technical challenges; things like capital smoothing and what I think of as elastic capital allocation: capital allocation directed by marginal cost (per unit-social-benefit) among a portfolio of operating non-profits. That stuff is exciting - and when it comes to fruition it will change the world in a huge way.
However, as you get into it you realize that even for high-performing and well-funded organizations, the challenges and roadblocks are much more pedestrian. They’re things like standardized metrics [1] and data collection when your program’s target members don’t have internet access.
Perhaps the toughest challenge is the most straightforward: the non-profit employees trying to tackle these problems are non-technical, with limited access to technical resources. They’re forced to become subject matter experts on impact metrics and analytics, data science and their database-of-choice all at once. It’s quite a challenge.
My passion for both the sector and the technical challenges led me to found sluce.io [2], which makes software that addresses this exact challenge for operating and supporting organizations as well as Impact Investors. I’m happy to discuss these challenges with anyone who’s interested.
[1] https://iris.thegiin.org/metrics https://iris.thegiin.org/metrics
[2] http://sluce.io http://sluce.io
- cdcarter 11y agoThank you for sharing IRIS. As a technologist for non-profits, it's something I've never seen before. Our industry is VERY fragmented. Your point about standardized metrics and data collection is very key. Even the organizations that realize a benefit to being data-driven just don't have the staff background in what that means or how to do it. From programs to funddev, staffs are trying to work with the limited data they are collecting, and making poor extrapolations based on that. Even working to implement good databases and good procedures can't make up for both executive level buy in and staff level training and understanding.
- bjelkeman-again 11y agoIndeed. It is a bit of an uphill struggle, but we are starting to see change though. I think some people are really starting to get it. And yes, IRIS is interesting for some things we do too!