3 ms·

My understanding is that a lot of new X11 features (such as XRandR, GEM memory managment, kernel mode-setting and so forth) are added to the core and to the ope

My understanding is that a lot of new X11 features (such as XRandR, GEM memory managment, kernel mode-setting and so forth) are added to the core and to the open-source drivers, and closed-source drivers lag behind significantly. Also, I've a friend with an nVidia-based laptop, and suspend/resume apparently works about one time in ten, while it worked flawlessly on my Intel-based laptop. Also, apart from the Paulsbro/GMA500 fiasco (which was contracted out to a third party), all Intel's graphics hardware has had open-source drivers written by Intel themselves, so it doesn't seem too extreme to expect similar support for Larrabee.

miloshh 17y ago
> it doesn't seem too extreme to expect similar support for Larrabee You have a point, but I think the reason NVIDIA doesn't open-source the drivers is the same as the reason Larrabee probably wouldn't open-source them - i.e. fear of releasing the details of the GPU design to the competition. Current Intel's graphics has nothing to hide from NVIDIA, but Lrrabee would. But of course, this is just speculation, especially now that no consumer Larrabee is on the horizon...