>That's a polyamorous (group) marriage, not a polygamist one Hmmm, please excuse my ignorance in such matters. I only married one woman and that is quite enou

>That's a polyamorous (group) marriage, not a polygamist one Hmmm, please excuse my ignorance in such matters. I only married one woman and that is quite enough. >you're basically saying polymarriages would be like corporations Yes, exactly. Well put. >with their associated complexity I can't even begin to imagine the complexity, legal or relational. However, I can imagine situations where such an arrangement could be beneficial to the individuals involved.