3 ms·

State is a prerequisite for law, except in a libertarian's dorm-room fantasies.

• baddox 11y ago
  It depends on your definitions. If you consider all legal systems to be "states," including primitive tribal ones, decentralized ones, etc., then yes, "state is a prerequisite for law" is a tautology. But today, "state" usually refers to a relatively large and relatively centralized organization governing a well-specified region that is recognized by other such states. Using that definition, a state is very clearly not a prerequisite for law.
  • pohl 11y ago
    The context that allows a system of laws to operate doesn't just spring forth spontaneously from a vacuum. Rather, it exists because we have a government based on the rule of law.
    • baddox 11y ago
      You didn't address any of the specifics in my comment.
      • pohl 11y ago
        That makes us even.
        • baddox 11y ago
          I addressed yours directly and in detail. Your claims depend on your definitions.