3 ms·
Yes, I also found this quite confusing. The way this paper was attributed seems quite sloppy. It mentions previous publication at the "NCSU COE People site" and
by smarks 11y ago
Yes, I also found this quite confusing. The way this paper was attributed seems quite sloppy. It mentions previous publication at the "NCSU COE People site" and gives a link, but omits mention that this paper was originally presented at the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2013):
http://2013.icse-conferences.org/index.html http://2013.icse-conferences.org/index.html
These notes shouldn't have been tacked onto the abstract. Instead they should have been clearly separated from the paper itself.
In addition, the PVS Studio team "added a short section" which appears as if it were a modification to the paper, and and it also appears in the augmented table of contents. If one is not reading carefully, or if the section heading has scrolled of the top of the screen, one might be misled into thinking the "added section" was also authored by Johnson et. al. instead of by the PVS Studio team. The "added short section" should also have been published entirely separately.