> Doing as the GP said would have these archaic rules also overturned. But at the expense of meaning that some couples wouldn't be able to marry, for, what - t

> Doing as the GP said would have these archaic rules also overturned. But at the expense of meaning that some couples wouldn't be able to marry, for, what - the next decade? Fifty years? And it's not as if a broader change to the meaning of marriage is off of the cards as a result of this - let's take the wins as they come.