4 ms·

Hypothetically, if overnight the earning potential of a developer was significantly reduced because some competitor could suddenly provide software development

Hypothetically, if overnight the earning potential of a developer was significantly reduced because some competitor could suddenly provide software development services better and cheaper than I currently can, would I expect the government to force the consumers of my services to pay my inflated rates and be less happy with the service - of course not! I'd be in a pretty bad situation, but I'd just have to accept reality, retrain, specialise, or find a new way to be competitive that sustained my existing lifestyle or at least didn't have it drop off a cliff. Of course in reality it's not overnight that these things happen, and it's not a sudden decision that people have to make because as yet, technological and societal progress isn't fast enough that people can't see change coming a few years off if they have their ear to the ground and follow what's going on in an industry. It's a really bad position to be in and I understand the instinct of wanting to fight it and looking to regulation for protection when it doesn't feel like there are many other choices. However, to continue to support the idea that taxi services the way they are currently operated and priced are needed, or even wanted, by the majority of people who know that a better way exists (i.e. Uber etc) is absurd. It's just denying reality. If a majority of customers know there is a better option, and want that better option, it will happen. The same will be true when driverless cars come along, are even cheaper and more convenient, and are therefore what people want more than a car with a driver. The choice then becomes: are you going to embrace change by changing yourself and trying to ride the wave, or put up an exhausting fight, ultimately lose and be left behind.

dheavy 11y ago
You summed up what happened to senior Flash/Flex developers who chose to turn to JS when smartphone came to be mainstream.
toomuchtodo 11y ago
> Hypothetically, if overnight the earning potential of a developer was significantly reduced because some competitor could suddenly provide software development services better and cheaper than I currently can, would I expect the government to force the consumers of my services to pay my inflated rates and be less happy with the service - of course not! No, I'd expect the government to force consumers to pay you a minimum wage. What's the problem with that? > If a majority of customers know there is a better option, and want that better option, it will happen. The same will be true when driverless cars come along, are even cheaper and more convenient, and are therefore what people want more than a car with a driver. I agree! And as long as you're following the relevant labor and transportation laws, feel free to provide said services to a customer base.
- JoshTriplett 11y ago
  > No, I'd expect the government to force you to pay minimum wage. What's the problem with that? Have you seen any indications that either Uber or taxis are failing to meet minimum wage laws? Not all "labor laws" are equivalent and useful. Some are bought and paid for by the current set of companies to stifle competition, because it's easier for them to comply than a new company, or because the laws outright ban competition.
  - toomuchtodo 11y ago
    > Have you seen any indications that either Uber or taxis are failing to meet minimum wage laws? Yes. Uber is violating the guidelines set out for classifying workers as independent contractors. Based on Uber's requirements, they should be properly categorized as employees, with the taxes paid by employers for their employees properly paid. > Not all "labor laws" are equivalent and useful. Some are bought and paid for by the current set of companies to stifle competition, because it's easier for them to comply than a new company, or because the laws outright ban competition. And its not up to the tech industry to decide which laws to obey and which to ignore because its convenient for their VCs. Want to change the law? Go change the law.
    - bopf 11y ago
      > Yes. Uber is violating the guidelines set out for classifying workers as independent contractors. Based on Uber's requirements, they should be properly categorized as employees, with the taxes paid by employers for their employees properly paid. I agree. Uber should play fair and hire the drivers, as they have been ordered to do in California. But France is fighting the Uber model to protect and outdated establishment. That in my view is not the job of a government.
      - toomuchtodo 11y ago
        Luckily, our views don't matter and France has taken action.
    - 11y ago

dheavy 11y ago

You summed up what happened to senior Flash/Flex developers who chose to turn to JS when smartphone came to be mainstream.

toomuchtodo 11y ago

> Hypothetically, if overnight the earning potential of a developer was significantly reduced because some competitor could suddenly provide software development services better and cheaper than I currently can, would I expect the government to force the consumers of my services to pay my inflated rates and be less happy with the service - of course not! No, I'd expect the government to force consumers to pay you a minimum wage. What's the problem with that? > If a majority of customers know there is a better option, and want that better option, it will happen. The same will be true when driverless cars come along, are even cheaper and more convenient, and are therefore what people want more than a car with a driver. I agree! And as long as you're following the relevant labor and transportation laws, feel free to provide said services to a customer base.

JoshTriplett 11y ago
> No, I'd expect the government to force you to pay minimum wage. What's the problem with that? Have you seen any indications that either Uber or taxis are failing to meet minimum wage laws? Not all "labor laws" are equivalent and useful. Some are bought and paid for by the current set of companies to stifle competition, because it's easier for them to comply than a new company, or because the laws outright ban competition.
- toomuchtodo 11y ago
  > Have you seen any indications that either Uber or taxis are failing to meet minimum wage laws? Yes. Uber is violating the guidelines set out for classifying workers as independent contractors. Based on Uber's requirements, they should be properly categorized as employees, with the taxes paid by employers for their employees properly paid. > Not all "labor laws" are equivalent and useful. Some are bought and paid for by the current set of companies to stifle competition, because it's easier for them to comply than a new company, or because the laws outright ban competition. And its not up to the tech industry to decide which laws to obey and which to ignore because its convenient for their VCs. Want to change the law? Go change the law.
  - bopf 11y ago
    > Yes. Uber is violating the guidelines set out for classifying workers as independent contractors. Based on Uber's requirements, they should be properly categorized as employees, with the taxes paid by employers for their employees properly paid. I agree. Uber should play fair and hire the drivers, as they have been ordered to do in California. But France is fighting the Uber model to protect and outdated establishment. That in my view is not the job of a government.
    - toomuchtodo 11y ago
      Luckily, our views don't matter and France has taken action.
  - 11y ago