3 ms·

I agree, I'm tired of hearing about this topic and the time wasted on it. Although, I'm waiting for the 3 consenting adults lawsuit, that will be interesting.

by talmand 11y ago

I agree, I'm tired of hearing about this topic and the time wasted on it. Although, I'm waiting for the 3 consenting adults lawsuit, that will be interesting. EDIT: since the world is full of reactionaries that love to take things out of context; my public disclaimer on this is that I have no issue with this ruling.

sseveran 11y ago
This will start shortly if it hasn't already.
vidarh 11y ago
Though sometimes it can be entertaining. In the UK the debate included one lord embarrassing himself by "warning" that gay marriage might lead to a lesbian queen giving birth to a future monarch through artificial insemination, as well as musing about how it could allow said lord to marry his son to escape inheritance tax [1] I'm already looking forward to reading some of the tripe that will be written about this SCOTUS decision... [1] http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/may/21/tebbit-gay-marriage-lesbian-queen http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/may/21/tebbit-gay-ma...
- talmand 11y ago
  I'm failing to understand how a lesbian queen and a queen giving birth through artificial insemination is even related. That's just weird. Was the guy suggesting if a queen married to a man, say with sperm issues, who chose to use artificial insemination would somehow produce a child that wouldn't be considered royalty? Even despite being born of the queen? What an idiotic comparison. Although, I like the father/son marriage thing. That's an interesting thought exercise concerning modern laws. Kind of silly, but interesting nonetheless.
  - vidarh 11y ago
    He was just trying to come up with the most offensive sounding (to his conservative constituency) examples to shock. The father/son marriage thing of course could not happen for the same reason we don't have father/daughter marriages today: the laws have restrictions on close relatives marrying.
    - talmand 11y ago
      Kind of late on this, but as recent events have shown, such laws can be changed.

by talmand 11y ago

sseveran 11y ago

This will start shortly if it hasn't already.

vidarh 11y ago

Though sometimes it can be entertaining. In the UK the debate included one lord embarrassing himself by "warning" that gay marriage might lead to a lesbian queen giving birth to a future monarch through artificial insemination, as well as musing about how it could allow said lord to marry his son to escape inheritance tax [1] I'm already looking forward to reading some of the tripe that will be written about this SCOTUS decision... [1] http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/may/21/tebbit-gay-marriage-lesbian-queen http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/may/21/tebbit-gay-ma...

talmand 11y ago
I'm failing to understand how a lesbian queen and a queen giving birth through artificial insemination is even related. That's just weird. Was the guy suggesting if a queen married to a man, say with sperm issues, who chose to use artificial insemination would somehow produce a child that wouldn't be considered royalty? Even despite being born of the queen? What an idiotic comparison. Although, I like the father/son marriage thing. That's an interesting thought exercise concerning modern laws. Kind of silly, but interesting nonetheless.
- vidarh 11y ago
  He was just trying to come up with the most offensive sounding (to his conservative constituency) examples to shock. The father/son marriage thing of course could not happen for the same reason we don't have father/daughter marriages today: the laws have restrictions on close relatives marrying.
  - talmand 11y ago
    Kind of late on this, but as recent events have shown, such laws can be changed.