4 ms·
Great news. Glad this won't be an issue going into the next presidential election. There's been so much time wasted on this issue when, at the end of the day, a
by slayed0 11y ago
Great news. Glad this won't be an issue going into the next presidential election. There's been so much time wasted on this issue when, at the end of the day, any 2 consenting adults should have all of the same rights as any other 2 consenting adults (barring felony conviction, poor mental health eval, etc).
- talmand 11y agoI agree, I'm tired of hearing about this topic and the time wasted on it. Although, I'm waiting for the 3 consenting adults lawsuit, that will be interesting. EDIT: since the world is full of reactionaries that love to take things out of context; my public disclaimer on this is that I have no issue with this ruling.
- sseveran 11y agoThis will start shortly if it hasn't already.
- vidarh 11y agoThough sometimes it can be entertaining. In the UK the debate included one lord embarrassing himself by "warning" that gay marriage might lead to a lesbian queen giving birth to a future monarch through artificial insemination, as well as musing about how it could allow said lord to marry his son to escape inheritance tax [1] I'm already looking forward to reading some of the tripe that will be written about this SCOTUS decision... [1] http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/may/21/tebbit-gay-marriage-lesbian-queen http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/may/21/tebbit-gay-ma...
- talmand 11y agoI'm failing to understand how a lesbian queen and a queen giving birth through artificial insemination is even related. That's just weird. Was the guy suggesting if a queen married to a man, say with sperm issues, who chose to use artificial insemination would somehow produce a child that wouldn't be considered royalty? Even despite being born of the queen? What an idiotic comparison. Although, I like the father/son marriage thing. That's an interesting thought exercise concerning modern laws. Kind of silly, but interesting nonetheless.
- vidarh 11y agoHe was just trying to come up with the most offensive sounding (to his conservative constituency) examples to shock. The father/son marriage thing of course could not happen for the same reason we don't have father/daughter marriages today: the laws have restrictions on close relatives marrying.
- talmand 11y agoKind of late on this, but as recent events have shown, such laws can be changed.
- bdcravens 11y agoFelony convictions and mental health evals have no bearing on marriages currently
- slayed0 11y agoThey do have a bearing on other rights though. I issued a blanket statement and wanted to make sure to list that there were exceptions.
- probablycorey 11y ago> Glad this won't be an issue going into the next presidential election. I wish this was true. But I think the decision will increase the discussion of marriage equality in the next election. Just look at the political impact abortion had after the supreme court decided Roe v. Wade. Abortion was used to galvanize conservative votes against liberals and SCOTUS.
- mason240 11y ago>Glad this won't be an issue going into the next presidential election. Has this been an issue presidential elections? I don't remember it being discussed at all.