3 ms·
I think you (and others) have espoused this viewpoint in other threads. I'll just say that having an outsider (perhaps a politician) re-appropriate words that
by ejstronge 11y ago
I think you (and others) have espoused this viewpoint in other threads.
I'll just say that having an outsider (perhaps a politician) re-appropriate words that have a clear, technical definition (say surveillance or security) must be frustrating for experts who understand those words.
Redefining a well-understood technical word is a good rhetorical technique but side steps whatever logic underlies the word's original defintion.