The obvious low hanging fruit is helping humans avoid error. But you have to actually be prepared to admit error for this to happen. You have to be ... cognitiv

The obvious low hanging fruit is helping humans avoid error. But you have to actually be prepared to admit error for this to happen. You have to be ... cognitively dissonant enough to treat error as just another information flow. The "software end game" looks a lot like the show "How It's Made". Frankly, most of that is just PLCs, which are barely computers at all. As to phone/desktop/laptop applications which do things for people, I think we're largely at satiety. That's always a dangerous prediction, but it's been at stasis now for quite some time.