3 ms·
Nope. The same tests you'd need anyhow to catch logic errors will end up catching type errors. If a test becomes unnecessary if you have static typing then you
by crdoconnor 11y ago
Nope. The same tests you'd need anyhow to catch logic errors will end up catching type errors.
If a test becomes unnecessary if you have static typing then you should never have written it in the first place. It's a bad test.
- dllthomas 11y ago"If a test becomes unnecessary if you have static typing then you should never have written it in the first place. It's a bad test." That seems a very strong - and unsupported - claim. Could you elaborate?