4 ms·
Author here. I'm inclined to agree, the naming is poor, it didn't start out as a serious product, and I never changed the name. That said, you can at least use
by anakic 11y ago
Author here. I'm inclined to agree, the naming is poor, it didn't start out as a serious product, and I never changed the name. That said, you can at least use the trial licence (free for 30 days) and after that who knows, maybe I'll rename the plugin to Excel SQL Studio 3000 XT and add an Enterprise Ultimate Premier License for 1200$.
- degenerate 11y agoPersonally I think the guy is a moron. If he wasn't banging his head so hard he might realize it's reasonably priced and he can save all the corporate hassle by purchasing it himself.
- git-fucked 11y agoYou say that as if his company would just allow him to use software he purchased himself...
- artmageddon 11y agoEnterprise doesn't work that way. There are a lot of situations where you aren't even allowed to use free-as-in-beer open source software due to security and/or other concerns, let alone software that you've paid for yourself. Besides, if the company is the one getting the benefit from the usage of the tool, why should he be the one paying for it?
- seanp2k2 11y agoThe way where I work works (technically enterprise, a couple thousand full-time employees), if you want some software and think it's reasonably-priced, you can buy it and expense it. I've never heard of anyone getting in any trouble over this. You can also submit a helpdesk ticket to have purchasing buy something for you, which is what we'd do for e.g. Subscription licenses which require someone entering a corporate card and keeping track of it.
- calgaryeng 11y agoHaha - you have clearly never worked for a 'real' company :)
- samstave 11y agoExSQLence.com