3 ms·
Heaviside was on the mathematician's side of this old debate: http://faculty.poly.edu/~jbain/histlight/readings/83Hunt.pdf http://faculty.poly.edu/~jbain/histli
by jhallenworld 11y ago
Heaviside was on the mathematician's side of this old debate: http://faculty.poly.edu/~jbain/histlight/readings/83Hunt.pdf http://faculty.poly.edu/~jbain/histlight/readings/83Hunt.pdf
He perfected operational calculus for electrical engineering: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operational_calculus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operational_calculus
Norbert Wiener in 1926:
"The brilliant work of Heaviside is purely heuristic,
devoid of even the pretense to mathematical rigor. Its
operators apply to electric voltages and currents,
which may be discontinuous and certainly need not be
analytic. For example, the favorite corpus vile on
which he tries out his operators is a function which
vanishes to the left of the origin and is 1 to the
right. This excludes any direct application of the
methods of Pincherle…
Although Heaviside’s developments have not been
justified by the present state of the purely
mathematical theory of operators, there is a great deal
of what we may call experimental evidence of their
validity, and they are very valuable to the electrical
engineers. There are cases, however, where they lead to
ambiguous or contradictory results..."
- madengr 11y agoWhat about Gibbs? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willard_Gibbs https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willard_Gibbs I thought del operator was his?
- LoSboccacc 11y agoand what about Gauss? the whole field was working or knew about the problem and each other knew the other researches, we just slapped the Maxwell name for recognition as he explained how the stuff worked (pretty much as Einstein equations weren't is own), and in the centuries became 'ownage' - it's interesting however to see how 'legends' form