Umm, 100k/year in 1950 would be roughly $994,966/year today. You're seriously going to argue you'd rather get paid 10 times less? Because you can buy cokes lik

Umm, 100k/year in 1950 would be roughly $994,966/year today. You're seriously going to argue you'd rather get paid 10 times less? Because you can buy cokes like celebrities? What is this nonsense? This sounds like the Fox News "poors shouldn't complain because they have phones and fridges" argument.